Current implementation gives prio to Collabora.
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Nov 8 2016
Nov 7 2016
Nov 6 2016
Nov 4 2016
Done.
Nov 2 2016
Tested and indeed there's a problem with this scenario. When handling an iTip we search for the event only in folders in personal and shared namespace. Here we have a folder in other user namespace. So, in [8] as well as in [6] the event cannot be found.
There were some related changes in git, some not packaged yet. I'll test git-master, to see if any of these issues can be still reproduced.
It actually is Roundcube core change. This was partially fixed in git-master. Fixed in release-1.1 with commits: 6fb8da08f, 1123f39cf and 9b8db4c9e.
Groups with email address specified will not be expanded with their members.
Oct 24 2016
Oct 21 2016
Oct 20 2016
Actually RFC5546 specifies a special case of acting on behalf of an organizer. So, I suppose we could assume that having write rights to calendar is such a case. Can't we?
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
This is not required by CODE. No need to keep an open ticket.
Currently fixed, but the ticket will be open until we unify document_editor_api.
I didn't test yet, but then I think the described behaviour is not exactly as expected. I.e. if UserB is not the organizer I do not expect attendees (nor organizer) to be informed. We should not send cancellation emails with UserB's as a sender. Or maybe we should? That's problematic.
@Robert_Selk are you using delegation feature or simple ACL modification? Or in other words, does UserB have identities with UserA's addresses? I'm asking just to be sure I test the same scenario.
Oct 19 2016
I've tested all special chars. It looks only two cause errors. It's "=EF=BF=BE" and "=EF=BF=BF". Fixed.
Oct 18 2016
Ok, I investigated this case. I have no idea yet why but mb_convert_encoding() converts ISO-8859-1 string of "=FC=81" into (UTF-8) "=C3=BC=EF=BF=BE" (using quoted-printable encoding).