Prioritising events
Open, NormalPublic


Creating an event:

Is the prioritizing option necessary?

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create an event
  2. Go to the category: Prioritize

Expected outcome: Highlighting the more important events, being able to differenciate between the events in regards to the importance, having fewer but more logical prioritizing options

actual outcome: Too many prioritizing options, no immidiate feedback, which events are more important


Ticket Type

Event Timeline

EsIsl created this task.Oct 26 2018, 12:45 PM
EsIsl updated the task description. (Show Details)Oct 26 2018, 2:11 PM

Yes I think it is, butt I would like a way to explain what itt does and I am not sure if you need 9 options, maybe less would be enough.

I like the option of prioritizing as well but also less steps and to see what the differences are.
And we have to change how this ticket looks with actual and expected results.

So I'll move it to done?

No, change it first!

EsIsl added a comment.EditedNov 8 2018, 9:00 PM

I didn´t really understand, why the option is available, because it doesn´t do anything really. If there would be a way to see the higher prioritized events more dominantly, that would be a possible solution.

EsIsl updated the task description. (Show Details)Nov 8 2018, 9:04 PM
EsIsl moved this task from In Progress to Done on the UX Seminar WS17 board.Nov 8 2018, 9:10 PM
bohlender moved this task from Done to 1 on the UX Seminar WS17 board.Nov 9 2018, 11:13 AM
bohlender triaged this task as Normal priority.
bohlender added a subscriber: bohlender.

Vorschlag: Funktion streichen

bohlender moved this task from 1 to 2 on the UX Seminar WS17 board.Nov 12 2018, 9:26 AM
pasik added a subscriber: pasik.May 23 2019, 2:24 PM